| |
Integrated
Pest Management is not just an industry "buzzword." It's also
not a nontoxic or fraudulent "device" designed to serve as an
alternative to conventional pest control. I see IPM as a consumer and industry
compromise. There is strong public interest in reducing the presence of
pesticides in our environment. People are demanding less exposure to all
types of toxicants, not just pesticides. Many pests have developed significant
levels of resistance to organophosphates and other commonly used pesticides.
There have been many lawsuits directly related to pesticide use and misuse.
Many pesticide applicators are at best "spray jockeys" with little
knowledge of insects, their behavior or biology.
IPM requires more work, training and commitment of the technician. Inspection
skills are as important as product knowledge. Communication with the client
is imperative. On sensitive accounts, educating the client on sanitation
and organizational skills is important. IPM is a prescriptive approach
to pest control versus a one size fits all approach.
IPM combines quality inspections with appropriate use of baiting, monitoring,
focused chemical application (not just broadcast spraying), sanitation
and exclusion.
Integrated Pest Management is primarily "low-impact pest management"
with permanent or longterm reduction in the target pest population. IPM
requires an integration of several approaches to managing pest problems
as compared to relying on a pesticide to eliminate the problem. This is
not a new concept; Many pest control professionals have been using this
type of management for years. IPM strategies offer many economic opportunities
for the professional. Since more time and education is required for sensitive
accounts, substantially more money can be charged for this knowledge.
In addition, a better relationship can be developed with the client as
a result of this higher level of interaction. Exclusion is a valuable
and economically important service. It is true that IPM will require more
training and education on the part of the technician. However, it will
bring more professionalism to our industry.
back
to top
|
|
Sharing home with
termites can eat into a budget
At the final meeting with my contractor for the proverbial "punch
list" of items to be done on our remodel, I pointed peevishly to
some sawdusty stuff on the floor. "Do you think your guys could be
a little more careful about cleanup?"
The man smirked. "That's not my guys -- that's termites," he
said, evidently happy to have caught me blaming him for something beyond
the scope of his contract. "You're going to have tent the place."
After eight months of construction that practically gutted every room
in the house, I blanched at the idea that I had ended up with a house
infested with an insect that was devouring my life savings like a bag
of potato chips.
According to National Pest Management Association, termites cause more
than $5 billion in damage every year -- more than fire and more than any
other wood-destroying insect. Every year, more than 2 million homes are
treated for termites. What's worse, this plague usually isn't covered
by homeowner's insurance. Here in Northern California, we're blessed with
all three species of termites: subterranean, dry wood and damp wood.
When faced with the prospect of pumping our house full of toxic gas, I
hesitated. For one thing, tenting the entire structure seemed like, well,
overkill. It was practically new, for God's sake. Were we really going
to have to move out, enclose food and other vulnerable items in gastight
containers and bomb our house?
I got on the Web to find a solution, but I was soon confronted by an entomological
horror show. Most of the pest-control companies' Web sites offer an education
in bugs that could be perfect stars for your next nightmare.
Termites eat 24/7, never stopping to rest or sleep. Some colonies can
eat 2 pounds of food a day. Termites can gain access to homes through
openings as small as 1/32 inch, and chew through vinyl, linoleum and underground
cable coverings. The combined weight of all termites is more than the
combined weight of all humans. Subterranean termite nests can contain
several million termites.
Each company promised time-tested, safe and effective methods, with each
job tailored to the situation. Not surprisingly, killing the voracious
vermin is big business. Nationally, they have spawned a multibillion-dollar
industry, whole fields of academic study (in one University of California
study, scientists built a house dubbed Villa Termiti to test nonchemical
alternatives) and more methods of execution than you can shake an electrogun
at.
Subterranean termites are now mainly treated by two methods. The first
is baiting, which involves monitoring where the termites are and then
placing bait -- typically, vertical tubes loaded with pesticide -- in
their path. The other method involves spraying or pouring liquid poison
directly on the soil around the house and on the affected areas.
According to John Chapman, entomologist and manager of technical services
for Terminix, baiting developed because many people were uncomfortable
with pouring chemicals on soil and wood that might prove toxic to children
and pets. "It's only a perception," says Chapman. "But
some people are uncomfortable with it."
Marion Moses at the Pesticide Education Center in San Francisco says this
is a typical response from pest-control companies. "They always defend
the pesticide," she says.
Historically, this meant defending DDT-like pesticides and other extremely
toxic chemicals that were once used to treat termites. But after many
years of lawsuits and consumer pressure, Moses says the companies have
changed. "They really have improved," she says. "It's not
only what pesticide they use but how it's used."
Still, she recommends that homeowners use restraint when fighting pests
in their homes. "I have two mantras: Don't use foggers, aerosols
or bombs in your house. And don't sign a contract to have someone come
to your home to treat your home or outside on a regular basis. If you
don't have cancer, you don't sign up for preventative chemotherapy, do
you?"
But of course this is what the big companies are often selling -- regular
contracts to keep the problem under control. Terminix recommends that
homes be inspected by a trained professional at least once a year. Chapman
says preventive treatment is a common option. "Some people don't
want to worry about it," he explains.
That mentality is what Moses attempts to educate against. "Baits
and traps work but they take time and people are very impatient,"
she says. "They want to use a quick knock-down. But I like to tell
people they never need to use a spray indoors."
For dry-wood termites -- the kind I have -- there are a handful of diverse
and much-debated methods. Tenting is the most common, and it's largely
accepted as the most dependable. It involves sealing and pumping a house
full of sulfuryl fluoride (Vikane is the brand name) or methyl bromide
(a potent ozone-depleter that has largely been phased out).
Presumably, you're safe as long as you don't enter the house while it's
still off-gassing. The companies recommend staying away for two days,
but Moses recommends that chemically sensitive people steer clear for
a week and make sure no leather, which can absorb the gas, is left exposed.
Other methods for dry-wood termites read like operating instructions for
the modern apocalypse: excessive heat or cold, electrocution and microwave.
Bill Mashek, founder of Northwest Termite and Pest Control, has one of
the few Bay Area termite-control companies that use methods beyond tenting
and poisons. For small infestations of dry-wood termites, he uses electroguns.
He's used a microwave machine but found it was often too cumbersome. He's
not a great fan of the heat method (which tents the entire house and brings
the air temperature to 160 degrees) because other companies have made
mistakes and burned down houses they were attempting to treat. He does,
however, tent homes when necessary. "You have to be practical,"
he says. "Sometimes that's the best available option."
But Mashek, who calls himself an old environmentalist, says he tries to
deal with the issue of pest control in a more holistic way. "Termites
are secondary invaders," he says, explaining that homes with dry
rot, excessive moisture and dirt-to-wood contact create environments that
attract this pestilence.
"You have to look at why they are there: Are there drainage problems?"
According to Mashek, the kinds of problems that attract bugs are far more
damaging than the bugs themselves. "A lot of times, people have substantial
rot damage and they don't seem that concerned about it, but they are very
worried about the termites. But rot damage destroys more homes than anything
else combined."
He also stresses that many companies exploit people's fear of pests. "It's
all marketing," he says. "Your house isn't going to fall down
because of termites. In some cases, if you're going to move in a few years,
you don't need to treat it -- you just need to do a bit more vacuuming."
So how do I know if I just need to buy some extra vacuum bags or begin
moving out? The only way to know is to have a pest-control technician
come and take a look.
If you're not selling or buying a house, most pest-control companies will
offer free inspections and estimates. If a company seems to be selling
you a product or service that makes you uncomfortable, get a second opinion.
After speaking to a host of top-dog bug-zappers, I came to understand
this: There's more than one way to kill the termite that is killing your
house.
|